Estimation of Aripiprazole in Bulk Drug and Formulation by UV-Derivative Spectroscopy

 

Sarma Shreya Balaram, Akula Ramesh and Jagadish P.C.*

Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences,

Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail:

 

ABSTRACT:

Aripiprazole is an atypical neuroleptic drug used to manage conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The aim of current work is to compare UV spectrophotometric and derivative techniques of aripiprazole to establish simple, sensitive method. In different spectrophotometric orders of aripiprazole, zero order has shown maximum absorbance at 217nm. Experimental wavelengths in other derivative orders were selected considering maximum absorbance. Wavelength difference and smoothing factor values were optimized to give improved spectral resolution and sensitivity. The method was linear and obeyed Beer’s law in the range of 1.0-6.0 µg/mL. Linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ) and accuracy were evaluated for each order as per ICH Guidelines. First order has shown highest correlation coefficient with lower values of LOD and LOQ whereas other derivative orders have shown higher values. So, first order derivative spectroscopy was identified as the best for the estimation of aripiprazole in bulk drug and formulation.

 

KEYWORDS: Aripiprazole, derivative spectroscopy, first order, second order, third order.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Aripiprazole, chemically is 7-{4-[4-(2, 3-dichlorophenyl) piperazin-1-yl] butoxy} -3,4-dihydroquinolin-2-one [Figure 1] with a molecular formula C23H27Cl2N3O2 and molecular weight 448.385. [1]

 

Figure 1: Aripiprazole chemical structure

 

Aripiprazole is a partial dopamine agonist, shows its antipsychotic activity by a combination of partial agonist activity at D2 and 5-HT1A receptors and antagonist activity at 5-HT2A receptors. Hence, it can be useful to relieve both positive symptoms and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. [1, 2] 

 

Derivative spectroscopy refers to the process of modification of a normal spectrum to its first, second or higher derivative spectrum. It can be used to clarify absorption bands in more complex UV spectra by using first or higher derivatives of absorbance with respect to wavelength. Gaussian band which represents an ideal absorption band is used as reference to understand the transformations occur in the derivative spectra. The derivative spectrum is measured either by the zero-crossing technique or the “peak-to peak” technique, or the “baseline–to peak” technique. [3, 4, 5, 6] Following are the advantages of derivative spectrophotometry over classical spectrophotometry: [7]

1) Useful in quantification analysis either for characterizing materials or for identification.

2)    Resolution between bands can be achieved with increase in order due to decrease in derivative centroid bandwidth.

3)    It eliminates baseline shifts and improves the accuracy of the method.

4)    Quantification of a narrowband component in presence of broadband component can be achieved by reducing errors caused by scattering.

5)    Identification and detection of trace levels of component in presence of strongly absorbing matrix.

 

Literature review reveals several analytical and bioanalytical methods for the estimation of aripiprazole including LC-MS methods[8,9], HPLC methods[10-12] and UV-Visible spectrophotometry methods [13,14]. Nevertheless no derivative spectroscopic methods were found in the literature for the determination of aripiprazole in tablets. The objective of current work is to compare the zero, first, second and third order spectroscopic techniques and to find out the most appropriate, sensitive and suitable spectrophotometric order which can be routinely used in quality control analysis for the estimation of aripiprazole in tablets.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Instruments:

UV-Visible spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Co, Japan) with a spectral bandwidth 0.1nm and wavelength accuracy ±0.5nm, a pair of 3cm quartz cells, Eppendorf micropipette of 100-1000μL and Sartorius electronic balance were used.

 

Chemicals and Reagents:

Aripiprazole standard (99.99%) was procured from Lupin pharmaceuticals, Pune as a gift sample. Acetonitrile was purchased from Merck. Aripiprazole tablets (Arpizol 30mg) were purchased from a local pharmacy.

 

Method development:

Selection of wavelengths:

Absorbance of working standards was determined at 217 nm for zero order, 209nm for first order, 199nm for second order and 223nm for third order respectively when scanned within the range of 190-400nm.

 

Figure 2: Aripiprazole spectrum

Preparation of stock solution:

Aripiprazole stock solution (1000µg/mL) was prepared by adding 25mg of aripiprazole to a 25mL volumetric flask containing 10mL of acetonitrile and sonicated for 2 minutes. Then the volume was made up to 25mL using same solvent. This stock solution was further diluted with the acetonitrile to obtain a standard solution of 100µg/mL. Acetonitrile was used as the solvent which offers minimal background interference.

 

Preparation of tablet solution:

Ten tablets of Arpizol (30mg of aripiprazole tablets) were weighed, powdered and average weight equivalent to 10 mg was accurately weighed and introduced into a 10mL volumetric flask, sonicated for 2 minutes with 5mL of acetonitrile and volume was made up to the mark with same. Then it was filtered through whattman filter paper no.41. From this, 10µg/mL solution was prepared.

 

Derivative spectroscopic analysis:

In derivative spectroscopy, wavelength range is affected by wavelength difference (Δλ) and n (smoothing factor) values. Noise is inversely proportional to wavelength difference and optimal wavelength range makes the peaks sharper and increases S/N ratio. Controlling the degree of smoothing improves sensitivity of the method. [15] A series of n values (n = 1-9) were tested for aripiprazole standard solutions of concentrations 1.0 – 6.0µg/mL and optimum values include wavelength range 190-300 nm, n = 9, Δλ = 2 nm were selected in the first, second and third-order derivative spectra.

 

RESULTS:

Method validation:

As per ICH guidelines specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, LOD, LOQ and robustness were performed. [16]

 

Specificity:

The standard (10µg/mL) and formulation (10µg/mL) solutions of aripiprazole, when scanned in the range of 190-400nm showed similar absorption spectra. Hence, it was concluded that excipients did not interfere with the quantitation of aripiprazole [Figure 3].

 

Figure 3: specificity


Precision:

Intra-day and Inter-day precision were performed by analyzing three different concentrations of aripiprazole twice in a day and on two different days.

 

Table 1: Intra-Day precision

Concentration (µg/mL)

Absorbance

%RSD

3

0.4458

0.5053%

0.4462

0.4499

4

0.5594

0.4773%

0.5640

0.5641

5

0.7010

0.3135%

0.7034

0.7054

 

Table 2: Inter-Day precision

Concentration (µg/mL)

Absorbance

%RSD

Day 1

Day 2

3

0.4458

0.4379

1.1507%

0.4462

0.4382

0.4499

0.4391

4

0.5545

0.5594

0.9483%

0.5564

0.5640

0.5509

0.5641

5

0.6928

0.7010

0.8507%

0.6930

0.7034

0.6924

0.7054

 

Accuracy:

Accuracy (recovery) studies were performed by standard addition method at three concentration levels 80%, 100%, and 120% by spiking appropriate amount of drug to the tablet solution of 100% concentration [Table 3].

 

Linearity:

The proposed method of analysis for aripiprazole was found to be linear in the range of 1-6μg/mL. The correlation coefficient of calibration curve obtained was with in the acceptable limits [Table 4] [Fig. 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b, 7a, and 7b].

 

Limit of detection (LOD) & Limit of quantitation (LOQ):

LOD and LOQ values of aripiprazole in different derivative orders were calculated from their respective regression equations [Table 4].

 

Table 3: Accuracy results in different orders

Order

Recovery level

%

Recovery

%Recovery

(Mean)

% RSD

Zero

80

101.24%

100.68

0.42%

100

100.21%

120

100.61%

First

80

99.24%

100.01

0.85%

100

99.61%

120

101.2%

Second

80

87.11%

88.49

3.81%

100

85.23%

120

93.13%

Third

80

102.10%

101.6

0.92%

100

100.29%

120

102.41%

 

Figure 4(a): zero order derivative spectrum

 

Figure 4(b): zero order linearity graph



Table 4: Linearity results in different orders

Order

Range

(µg/mL)

Wavelength

(nm)

Regression equation

Slope

Intercept

r2

LOD

(µg/mL)

LOQ (µg/mL)

Zero

1 – 6

217

y=0.1343x+0.0148

0.1343

0.0148

0.9999

0.1124

0.3408

First

1 – 6

209

y=0.0499x+0.0015

0.0499

0.0015

0.9997

0.0116

0.0350

Second

1 – 6

229

y=0.0147x+0.00007

0.0147

0.00007

0.9997

0.0470

0.1426

Third

1 – 6

199

y= 0.0036x+0.0001

0.0036

0.0001

0.9982

0.1522

0.4612

 

Figure 5(a): first order derivative spectrum

 

Figure 5(b): first order linearity graph

 

Figure 6(a): Second order derivative spectrum

 

Figure 6(b): Second order linearity graph

 

Figure 7(a): Third order derivative spectrum

 

Figure 7(b): Third order linearity graph

Robustness:

The evaluation of robustness was done by deliberate variation of maximum absorbance wavelength.

 

Table 5: Robustness:

Wavelength (nm)

Absorbance

%RSD

216

0.5783

0.3553 %

217

0.5806

218

0.5665

 

DISCUSSION:

Aripiprazole is soluble in solvents like acetonitrile, ethanol and sparingly soluble in methanol. Ethanol and methanol showed higher background interferences at its lambda maximum as compared to acetonitrile. Hence, acetonitrile was selected as the solvent. The calibration curves were constructed at the wavelengths corresponding to maxima at analytical wavelengths 217nm, 209nm, 199nm, 223nm for zero order, first order, second order and third order respectively. Linearity and accuracy parameters for each derivative order was carried out and compared with the zero order. Out of all, first and third order derivatives showed better recoveries while LOD and LOQ values were lower for first [Table 6].

 

Table 6:Comparison of derivative orders

Parameters

Zero order

First order

Second order

Third order

λ max

217

209.20

199.20

223.20

r2

0.99994

0.9997

0.9997

0.9982

Slope

0.13434

0.0499

0.0147

0.0036

Intercept

0.01483

0.0015

0.00007

0.0001

LOD(µg/mL)

0.11240

0.01158

0.0470

0.1522

LOQ(µg/mL)

0.34080

0.0350

0.1426

0.4612

%Recovery

100.68%

98.86%

88.48%

101.6%

 

CONCLUSION:

The first order derivative was more sensitive having lower LOD and LOQ values and found to be more accurate, reproducible, and sensitive when compared to zero order UV spectroscopic method for quantification of aripiprazole. Hence, the first order method can be routinely used in quality control analysis to assess pharmaceutical tablet formulation.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Aripiprazole [Online Database] Available at http://www.drug bank.ca/drugs/DB01238 (cited on 7 January 2014)

2.       Aripiprazole [Online Database] Available at http://www.rxlist.com/abilify-drug/clinical-pharmacology.htm (cited on 7 January 2014)

3.       Panditi V, Anjaneyulu V. Validated First Order Derivative Spectroscopic Method for the determination of Stavudine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. International Journal of ChemTech Research 2011; 3(1): 18-22.

4.       Rathod D, Dole M and Sawant S. Spectrophotometric Determination of Glipizide in Bulk and Tablet dosage form by Absorption Maxima, First Order Derivative Spectroscopy and Area Under the Curve. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical & Clinical Research 2012; 5(3): 102-104.

5.       Ozaltin N, Kocer A. Determination of Omeprazole in pharmaceuticals by derivative spectroscopy. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1997; 16: 337-342.

6.       Beckett A.H, Stennlake J.B, Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 4th edition, New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distribution.

7.       Anthony J. Owen (1995) 'Uses of Derivative Spectroscopy' [Online]. Available at: http://www.agilent.com/chem (cited on 25th December 2013).

8.       Masanori K, Yasuo M, Yukihiro H and Takahiko O. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantitative determination of aripiprazole and its main metabolite, OPC-14857 in human plasma.  Journal of Chromatography B 2005; 822(1-2): 294–299.

9.       Xiao C.Z, Wang F, Xu P, Zhu R, Li H.  LC-ESI-MS for rapid and sensitive determination of aripiprazole in human plasma. Chromatography 2006; 64: 387-391.

10.    Frederique L, Kayssa D, Khalid T, Linda K, Sophie B, Pascal P and Marie L P, et al., Development and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography method using diode array detection for the simultaneous quantification of aripiprazole dehydro aripiprazole in human plasma. Journal of Chromatography B 2008; 867: 15–19.

11.    Musenga A, Saracino M A, Spinelli D, Rizzato E, Boncompagni G, Kenndler E et al., Analysis of the recent antipsychotic aripiprazole in human plasma by capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008; 612: 204-211.

12.    Shimokawa Y, Akiyama H, Kashiyama E, Koga T and Miyamoto G. High performance liquid chromatography methods for the determination of aripiprazole with ultraviolet detection in rat plasma and brain: application to the pharmacokinetics. J Chromatography B 2005; 821: 8-14.

13.    Nagamallika J, Mahesh A. Development and Validation of Spectrophotometric Method for the estimation of Aripiprazole in tablet dosage form. Asian J. Pharm. Ana 2011; 1 (3): 46-49.

14.    Kalaichelvi R, Thangabalan B, Srinivasa Rao D, and Jayachandran E. UV Spectrophotometric Determination of Aripiprazole in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulation. E-journal of Chemistry 2009; 6(S1): 87-90. [Online] Available at http://www.e-journals.net (cited on 23 December 2013).

15.    Yilmaz B. Determination of Atenolol in Pharmaceutical Preparation by Zero-, first-, Second- and Third- order Derivative Spectroscopic methods. FABAD J. Pharm. Sci. 2008; 33: 119-129.

16.    ICH, Validation of Analytical procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1). International Conference on Harmonization (Geneva, 2005).

 

 

 

 

Received on 15.05.2014                Modified on 15.06.2014

Accepted on 24.06.2014                © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 7(10): Oct. 2014 Page 1113-1117